The way in which facts are presented to a judge or jury are controlled by statutes commonly referred to as the Florida Evidence Code. To a non-lawyer these rules may appear constricting. They are designed, however, to ensure that the facts (proof) used against an accused have been sufficiently sanitized so as to provide a judge or jury with only those facts that will allow them to make a fair assessment of the case and render a true and just verdict.
The Florida Evidence Code identifies the ways to correctly admit testimonial evidence and demonstrative (physical) evidence during a hearing or trial. If the method used by an attorney to admit evidence at a hearing or trial is not correct, the opposing attorney will rise and say the word “objection” followed by the code provision or nature of the objection based upon the applicable code provision. The offending attorney will sometimes get the chance to explain why the objection should be overruled (not be upheld) and why the evidence should come in. The attorney making the objection will sometimes get the opportunity to argue why the objection should be upheld (sustained). The judge always makes the decision. Before making an objection, the attorney must quickly decide if the information is detrimental to his or her client’s case. If it is not a detriment to the case, the attorney may strategically decide not to “object” even if the objection may have been sustained. Below are a few of the classic objections that an attorney will consider:
“Relevance“ Objection:
This objection is generally made when evidence, or what appears to be forthcoming evidence, does not tend to prove or disprove a material fact of the case.
“Leading” Objection:
This objection is generally made against the attorney who has called, and is questioning, his or her own witness. A leading question is defined as a question in which the desired answer is contained within the question.
“Hearsay” Objection:
This objection is made when an out-of-court statement is repeated in court for the purpose of claiming that the content of the out-of-court statement is true. There are many exceptions to this rule which are often the cause of legal arguments outside the presence of the jury.
“Speculation” Objection:
This objection is made when a witness is asked a question that requires the witness to guess as to the answer.
“Prejudice Outweighs Probative Value” Objection:
This objection is made when evidence that may be relevant is offered by a party, but the opposing side believes the introduction of the evidence to the jury would have such a prejudicial effect that the jury could no longer be fair and impartial. The feared result is a verdict that is not based upon the facts and the law but upon the animosity felt by the jury against the party.
“Authentication” Objection:
This objection is made when physical evidence or a written document is offered as evidence during a trial, but the offering attorney has not shown that the item in question is in fact what the attorney claims it to be.